Terance Alex, M/A-Aged 37 Yrs v. State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.03.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH Crl.O.P.No.8882 of 2017 Terance Alex ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs

1. State Represented by Inspector of Police, G3, Kilpauk Police Station, Chennai District, In charge of W4, All Women Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai District. ... Respondent/complainant

2. Mary Sowmya Rose (Impleaded as second respondent as per the order of this Court dated 07.03.2018 in Crl.M.P.No.3361 if 2018 in Crl.O.P.No.8882 of 2017) ... Respondents Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings pending in C.C.No.2879 of 2011 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner :Mr.C.D.Johnson For Respondents :Mrs.Kritika Kamal.P Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 :Mr.Manoj Sreevatsan for R2

ORDER

The petitioner as well as the defacto complainant have entered into a joint compromise memo and filed the joint compromise memo dated 19.08.2015. Both the parties had agreed that the proceedings in C.C.No.2879 of 2011 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai may be quashed. The memorandum of compromise reads as follows:

The First Party shall file in the Hon'ble Madras High Court a petition for quash of C.C.No.2879 of 2011 pending before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai and the Second Party shall file necessary affidavit stating no objection for quashing the said C.C.No.2879 of 2011 against the first party and also state no objection in allowing the quash petition of the other accused in the said case. Before disposing of these quash petitions the First Party shall pay the aforesaid balance amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to the Second Party.

2. In view of the specific understanding between the parties, I am of the view that the proceedings need not be continued in C.C.No.2879 of 2011 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

3. Hence, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. The proceedings in C.C.No.2879 of 2011 on the file of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai are quashed. The Joint Memo of Compromise shall form part of the order.

*Enclosed Xerox copy of the Memo of Compromise. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dh To 1.The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Egmore, Chennai.

2. The Inspector of Police, G3, Kilpauk Police Station, Chennai District, In charge of W4, All Women Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.8882 of 2017 nr 11/06/2018