Madras High CourtCRL RC/930/2014dismissed as infructuous

R.Jayapal S/O.Late.B.Rajagopal v. State Rep.By The Inspector Of

2017-08-03Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.08.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN Crl.RC.Nos.930 and 931 of 2014 R.Jayapal .. Petitioner in both the cases Vs State Rep by The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB/Chennai.

(RC No.18(A) 2006.

.. Respondent in both the cases Criminal Revisions are filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.PC to set aside the order passed in Cr.MP.Nos.304 and 306 of 2009 in CC.Nos.1 and 2 of 2009 on the file of the II Additional District Judge/Special Judge (CBI Cases), Coimbatore dated 31.07.2014. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Gunalan No apperance in both the cases.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Srinivasan, Spl.P.P. for CBI Cases in both the cases.

COMMON ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the learned counsel on record.

2. The learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases represented that charges were already framed and trial was also commenced and PW1 to PW4 were examined.

http://www.judis.nic.in

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

tsh

3. Considering the submissions made by the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI cases, hence, nothing survives in these revision petitions.

4. In the result, both the criminal revisions are dismissed as infructuous.

03.08.2017.

Index : Yes/No.

1. II Additional District and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Coimbatore

2. The Special Public Prosecutor, CBI Cases, High Court Madras.

3. The Inspector of Police, CBI/ACB/Chennai.

Crl.RC.Nos.930 and 931 of 2014.

http://www.judis.nic.in