M.Sathianathan v. S.Sundararaman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated :03.07.2024

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI 1.M.Sathianathan 2.R.Boopalan 3.Chitra Nageswaran 4.Nageswari 5.Parameshwari 6.V.Sukumaran 7.B.Jayakumar 8.Lalitha 9.Usha 10.Sasikala 11.Sumathi 12.Rathinavelu 13.M.Kamalavathani 14.Rathi Devi 15.Bhavani 16.S.Bhuvaneshwari 17.T.S.Parthiban 18.T.S.Krishnakumar 19.S.Kanchanadevi 20.T.S.Mohan .... Plaintiffs vs 1.S.Sundararaman 2.R.Venkataraman 3.Anjali 4.S.Padmavati (4th defendnat impleaded as per order dated 06.04.2016 in Appln.No.1146 of 2016) ... Defendants 1/4

Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code praying for cancelling the sale deed dated 27.11.2008 executed in favour of the defendants 1 and 2 by the plaintiffs 2 to 15 through the first plaintiff registered as Document No.7396 of 2008 on the file of the Joint Sub Registrar, South Chennai as one obtained without consideration and cancel the sale deed dated 13.03.2009 executed in favour of the defendants 1 and 2 by the plaintiffs 16 to 20 through the first plaintiff registered as Document No.1041 of 2009 on the file of the Joint Sub Registrar, South Chennai as one obtained without consideration. For Plaintiff s : Mr.A.V.Arun For Defendants : Mr.S.Ramesh For 2nd defendant D.1, D.3 and D.4 - no appearance

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the plaintiffs has filed a Memo on behalf of the plaintiffs stating that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and hence, the suit may be dismissed as settled out of court. 2/4

2. The Memo is taken on record. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the suit is dismissed as settled out of court. Registry is directed to refund the court fee, as per Law to the plaintiffs. No costs. 03.07.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sr To The Section Officer, Original Side (Records), High Court, Chennai.

3/4

P.B.BALAJI,J., sr C.S.No.802 of 2012 03.07.2024 4/4