K.Thilla Mohamed v. State Rep.By

CRL. O.P. No.12305 of 2016 S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.

Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 468 and 471 IPC in Crime No.1322 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with his family members entered into the property of the defacto complainant and created forged documents with respect of the said property and tried to encroach upon the property.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the said property and in the absence of the petitioner, the defacto complainant has encroached into the property of the petitioner and has given false complainant against the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.

Side) opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the ground that on verification of the documents produced by the petitioner, it was found that they were forged documents and the investigation is in the initial stage.

5. Taking note of the fact that fabricated documents have been produced in order to usurp the property, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and the petition is dismissed.

17.06.2016 vrc