← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/6069/2025dismissed

Devendran v. The State Rep By, The Forest Range Officer,

2025-03-18Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18-03-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Devendran S/o Perumal, No.72/C, Seramarathur, Kovilur, Athipattu, Tiruvannamalai District.

Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Forest Range Officer, Jamunamarathur Forest Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

(STOR No. 01 Of 2025 Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner on bail in event of his arrest at the hands of the respondent police concerned in STOR No.1 of 2025 on such terms and conditions and as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper and thus render Justice.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr. R. Parthiban For Respondent(s):

Mr. S. Santhosh, Govt. Advocate

ORDER

The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner along with other accused had involved in illegal transportation of 98 kilograms of sandal wood. Hence, the case.

2. This is the second anticipatory bail petition before this Court. The earlier anticipatory bail petition in Crl. O.P. No. 1341 of 2025 was dismissed on 29.01.2025 by Hon'ble Mr.Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira and this anticipatory bail petition is listed before this Court pursuant to the orders passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl. O.P. No. 31787 of 2024 on 04.03.2025.

3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that 181 sandal pieces was seized from A2 and the petitioner is A1. He had one previous case, similar in nature and there is no change in circumstances. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. This Court while dismissing the first anticipatory bail petition passed the following orders:

"6. Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and the nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner."

5. This Court is of the view that there is no change in circumstances and hence, is not inclined to entertain this second anticipatory bail petition.

6. Hence, the anticipatory bail petition is dismissed. 18-03-2025 AT

To 1.The State Rep By, The Forest Range Officer, Jamunamarathur Forest Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

(STOR No. 01 of 2025

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

AT CRL OP No. 6069 of 18-03-2025