Chandra v. Natesan @ Muthusamy

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.12.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. PONGIAPPAN S.A.No.1181 of 2011 1.Chandra 2.Palaniammal 3.Annamalai 4.Alli 5.Palani ... Appellants/Appellants/Plaintiffs 2 to 6 vs.

1.Natesan @ Muthusamy 2.Murugan 3.Appusamy 4.Solai @ Sellamuthu 5.Sivalingam ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants Prayer : The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 08.03.2006 made in A.S.No.99 of 2005 on the file of the Principal District Court, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2004 made in O.S.No.207 of 1998 on the file of the Sub Court, Sankari. For Appellants :No Appearance For Respondent-2 :Mr.N.Manokaran Respondents-1 & 3 :Died Respondent-4 :No appearance Respondent-5 :Not ready in notice

JUDGMENT

When this appeal came up for hearing on 09.12.2021, the learned counsel for the appellants appeared before this Court and reported "No instructions" for the appellants. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to print the name of the appellants in the cause-list and to list the matter under the caption 'For Dismissal' on 14.12.2021. Accordingly, the case was listed today under the caption 'For dismissal'.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Even today (14.12.2021), though the name of the appellants are printed in the cause-list, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants either in person or through counsel. Learned counsel appearing for the second respondent is present. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR rsi To 1.The Principal District Judge, Salem.

2.The Subordinate Judge, Sankari.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to M/s.N.Manokaran, Advocate Sr.66831 S.A.No.1181 of 2011 sra[co] srg 04/01/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/