M.Sathyaseelan, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No. 5444 of 2018 M. Sathyaseelan

...Petitioner

-Vs1. The Revenue Divisional Officer -cum- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Thasildhar Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Pallavaram Police Station, Pallavaram, Chennai.

...Respondents

Prayer:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to pass an order in Crime No. 158 of 2007 dated 21.03.2007 in Na. Ka No. 2130/2007 dated 09.04.2007.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The prayer in the petitioner is to direct 1st respondent herein to pass an order in Crime No. 158 of 2007 dated 21.03.2007 in Na. Ka No. 2130/2007 dated 09.04.2007.

2. No Appearance for the petitioner. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents submitted that in Crime No. 158 of 2007 notices were issued to the parties concerned under Section 145 Cr.PC and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

now the entire proceedings are over and therefore, the prayer sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous.

4. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ak

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer -cum- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District.

2. The Thasildhar Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Pallavaram Police Station, Pallavaram, Chennai.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

W.P.No. 5444 of 2018 gp[co] srg 17/06/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/