← Library
Madras High CourtA/1163/2020allowed

K.Senthil Kumar S/O.T.Kannan v. Kalai Vani

2020-03-16Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

(TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T.ASHA A. No.1163 of 2020 and O.P.No.568 of 2016 In the matter of Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of and In the matter of Certified copy of the Last the Will and Testament of T.Kannan (Deceased) K.SENTHIL KUMAR, S/o.T.Kannan, New No.19, Old No.E-160, C Type, MMDA Colony, Arumbakkam, Chennai-106.

..Applicant/Petitioner -vsKALAI VANI D/o.T.Kannnan, W/o.M.Senthil Kumar, No.8, Kulam Abbas Ali Khan, 4th Street, Thousand Light, Royapet, Chennai-14.

..Respondent/Respondent

A.No.1163 of 2020:

This application praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue subpoena to the Headmaster of CSI Higher Secondary School No.12, Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004, (Near Light House) to appear before the Hon'ble Master to record the evidence of the Applicant/Petitioner.

O.P.No.568 of 2016:

This original petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to that the Letters of Administration with the will annexed may be granted to him as the son/beneficiary under the Will of the said deceased having effect limited to the state of Tamil Nadu.

These application and Original Petition coming on this day before this court for hearing the court made the following order:- The above application has been taken out by the petitioner to issue subpoena to the Head Master of CSI Higher Secondary School, No.12 Santhome High Road, Mylapore, Chennai- 600 004 to record the evidence of the petitioner who is both deaf as well as mute.

2. The main petition is filed for issuance of letter of administration in respect of the will executed by his father T.Kannan.

3. Considering the fact that the petitioner cannot give original evidence and his evidence has to be interpreted by a person who knows the sign language, the above application has been taken out.

4. Though notice was served on the respondent, none appeared on behalf of the respondent.

5. Considering the reasons given in the affidavit filed in support of the above application, the application is allowed as prayer for. Sd/.P.T.A.J.

16.03.2020 //Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2020. SU/20.03.2020 COURT OFFICER (O.S.) From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.