Mukesh @ Subash v. State Rep By Inspector Of Police

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.01.2023 for the offences punishable under Section 392 @ 397 of IPC, in Crime No.19 of 2023 on file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the de-facto complainant is that the accused has waylaid the de-facto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.1000/- from him at knife point. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case, since he has got some previous cases. He further submitted that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he is in custody from 18.01.2023. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner is a notorious criminal having 21 previous cases. He further submitted that as far as this case is concerned, the petitioner has robbed a sum of Rs.1000/- from the de-facto complainant. He also stated that the investigation in this case is at initial stage, therefore, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and also considering the previous cases pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 27.02.2023 ham

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

ham 27.02.2023