Madras High CourtCRP/2530/2013dismissed as infructuous

Ranganadan v. Pandurangam Pillai

2019-02-25Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.02.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR C.R.P(NPD) No.2530 of 2013 B.Ranganadan ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs.

1. Pandurangam Pillai

2. Lakshmi @ Sarasvady

3. Danaraja Pillai

4. Vimala

5. Nirmala @ Thangaponnu

6. Barthasarady

7. Danapakiam ...1st Respondent/Third party PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as against the order and decreetal order dated 20.09.2012 made in I.A.No.74 of 2012 in A.S.No.10 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry. For Petitioner : Mr.T.P.Manoharan

O R D E R

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order passed in I.A.No.74 of 2012 in A.S.No.10 of 2011, on the file of the Court of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry. http://www.judis.nic.in

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

ssi

2. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petition has become infructuous, in view of the disposal of the appeal and copy of the judgment is also produced and the same indicates that the appeal itself was partly allowed. Hence, nothing survives in this revision petition.

3. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

25.02.2019 Index: Yes/No Speaking/ Non-Speaking ssi To

1. The III Additional District Court, Puducherry.

2. The Section Officer, VR Section, Madras High Court. C.R.P(NPD) No.2530 of 2013 http://www.judis.nic.in