Abi @ Remo Abi @ Abilash v. The State Rep.By, Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.3358 of 2026 Abi @ Remo Abi @ Abilash ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. by, Inspector of Police, Tindivanam Police Station, Villupuram District.

... Respondent (Crime No.46 of 2026) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita of BNSS, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.46 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Muruganandham For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 351(3) of BNSS, 2023 in Crime No.46 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with other accused, abused and attacked the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the injured was treated as an inpatient and that seven previous cases are pending against the petitioner, which are similar in nature. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. I have also gone through the FIR and other materials. No one injured in this case, though it is stated having seven previous case, considering the nature of

the allegations, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tindivanam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of her order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] the sureties shall affix her photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure her identity;

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate

orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

12.02.2026 kmm

To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tindivanam.

2. The Inspector of Police, Tindivanam Police Station, Villupuram District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR , J.

kmm Crl.O.P.No.3358 of 2026 12.02.2026