← Library
Madras High CourtWP/5938/2017disposed of

R.M.Chokkalingam v. The Project Director

2018-07-30Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.07.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.5938 of 2017 R.M.Chokkalingam

...Petitioner

Versus

1.The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Perambalur.

2.The Block Development, Alathur, Trichy.

3.Thiru. Barathi Dasan, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union, Veppur.

... Respondents Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 10.8.2016 seeking refund of the amount spent on construction of Village Panchayat Service Centre at Elanthankuli, Alathur Union, by recovering the same from the third respondent with accrued interest till the date of settlement of the same. For Petitioner :Mr.Sugumar For Respondents:Mr.N.Inbanathan Additional Government Pleader or R1 Mr.P.Senthilvel for R2

O R D E R

Heard Mr.Sugumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.N.Inbanathan, learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent and Mr.P.Senthilvel, learned counsel for the second respondent.

2.According to the petitioner, while he was working as a Junior Engineer in Alkathur Union, he constructed a Panchayat Services Center at the cost of Rs.3,00,000/-. Despite his representation the amount was not disbursed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.8.2016.

4. The learned Additional Government Pleader for the first respondent submitted that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 10.8.2016 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after providing ample opportunity to all necessary parties, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To 1.The Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Perambalur.

2.The Block Development, Alathur, Trichy.

3.Thiru. Barathi Dasan, Block Development Officer, Panchayat Union, Veppur.

+1cc to M/S.Sugumar, Advocate Sr.51265 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.51918 W.P.No.5938 of 2017 srg 13/08/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/