Mrs.Anjamani v. The Tahsildar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.04.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.8951 of 2017 Anjamani ... Petitioner Vs.
The Tahsildar, Ulundurpettai Taluk, Villupuram District.
... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2017 and issue patta in favour of the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ranganathan For Respondent : Mr.R.S.Selvam, Government Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2017 and issue patta in his favour. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has given his representation as early as on 03.01.2017, the respondent has not considered the same yet.
3.Mr.R.S.Selvam, learned Government Advocate taking notice for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2017 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law.
4.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2017 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
5.With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Index : No 13.04.2017 Internet : Yes va To The Tahsildar, Ulundurpettai Taluk, Villupuram District.
M.DURAISWAMY, J.
va W.P.No.8951 of 2017 13.04.2017