M.Dinesh v. The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twelfth day of April Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.7361 of 2022 M.DINESH [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, [ RESPONDENT ] DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, 4VRV+4JR,CHINNA EKKADU, JAYA NAGAR, THIRUVALLUR, TAMIL NADU- 602001.

CRIME NO.50 OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S.YAMINI JAI DIVYA Advocate For Respondent : M/S.L.BASKARAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervener : M/S.G.ILAMURUGU, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 420, 406, 417 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Crime No.50 of 2021 on the file of the respondent seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with another induced the defacto complainant and collected a sum of Rs.84,65,000/- from the defacto complainant that he will get medical Medical Seats in Saveetha College for his son and for his son's friend. Thereby, he provided fake confirmation letter and cheated the money. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner did not commit any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that more than Rs.84,00,000/- was involved in this case. He further submits that this Court dismissed the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail petition in Crl.OP.No.24875 of 2021 dated 17.12.2021. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. The learned Counsel for the Intervenor submits that the huge amount was collected (Rs.84,65,000/-) from the defacto complainant that he will get medical Medical Seats in Saveetha College for his son and for his son's friend. Thereby, he provided fake confirmation letter and cheated the money. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by both counsel and also the fact that the huge amount was involved in this case and there is no change of circumstances after dismissal of the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail petition. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 12/04/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, 4VRV+4JR,CHINNA EKKADU, JAYA NAGAR, THIRUVALLUR, TAMIL NADU- 602001.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.G.ILAMURUGU Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 5620 CRL OP.7361/2022 Date :12/04/2022 RW 20/04/2022