← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4335/2023dismissed

V.Sathyaseelan v. Inspcetor Of Police

2023-02-27Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.01.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 342, 392, 336, 397, 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.46 of 2023 on file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused have trespassed into the de-facto complainant's clinic and by threatening him with scissor, robbed a sum of Rs.20,000/-, mobile phone, car key and CCTV camera from his clinic and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that even the name of the petitioner does not find place in the First Information Report, he has been implicated as an accused. He also stated that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he is in

custody from 30.01.2023. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the petitioner along with other accused had trespassed into the de-facto complainant's Ayurvedha Clinic and by threatening him with scissor, robbed a sum of Rs.20,000/-, mobile phone, car key and CCTV camera from his clinic. He further submitted that the amount has been recovered from the accused. He also stated that three previous case are pending as against the petitioner. Therefore, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the entire materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and also considering the gravity and nature of the offence, this Court finds that this case needs a detailed investigation. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 27.02.2023 ham

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

ham 27.02.2023