A.Arun v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.03.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.5832 of 2021 A.Arun

...Petitioner

Versus

1. State Rep. by The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2. State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore NT Police Station, Cuddalore District.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the basis of the enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Manimaran For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner on the basis of the enquiry.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3.When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor represented that neither a case registered nor a petition enquiry is pending against the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssr To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Cuddalore NT Police Station, Cuddalore District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.R.Sasikumar, Advocate, S.R.No.15502. W.P.No.5832 of 2021 SKY(CO) CSR 31.03.2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/