The State Of Tamilnadu v. D Thamaraimanalan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN in W.A.SR.No.17044 of 2026

1. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep. by its secretary, Labour and Employment Department Fort st. George Chennai-60009

2. The Commissioner Of Labour DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai-600018 ..Appellant(s) Vs

1. D Thamaraimanalan Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Enforcement), Vellore NO.230, Ayodhya Nagar Triplicane, Chennai

2. G.Gnanasambanthan Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Enforcement), Nagercoil NO.70, VSM Harder street Jafferkhanpet, Ashoknagar Chennai

3. S.Sudha Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Enforcement), Gudalur

79, Pilaiyarkoil street Balapananthavanam Thanjavur-613008

4. J.Ravi Jeyaram Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Enforcement), Kancheepuram 50, 51 Surammal Street Natcchatra Homes Egmore, Chennai-08

5. The Principal Secretary Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department Secretariat Chennai-600009

6. The Secretary Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission Chennai-600002

7. P.Shobana Assistant Commissioner of Labour (Social Security Scheme) Ponneri ..Respondent(s) To condone the delay of 2392 days in filing the above Writ Appeal against the order dt. 18.06.2019 passed in WMP No.16506/2019 in WP No.16924/2019 on the file of this Honble Court For Appellant(s):

Mr.R.Neelakandan, AAG assisted By Dr.S.Suriya, Agp For Respondent(s):

Mr.L.Chandrakumar, Mr.N.Balamuralikrishnan Mr.Karthikrajan Mr.R.Syed Mustafa

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The writ petition has been filed challenging the order of stay granted in the writ petition.

2. Learned Additional Advocate General, Mr.Neelakandan, would submit that the appellants have now proposed to prepare a panel for promotion and on account of the interim order, they are unable to finalise the panel.

3. Heard the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the appellants/petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

4. The writ appeal has been moved belatedly. Moreover, the writ petition is also pending before this Court. That being the factum, this Court is inclined to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. The petition is ordered. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 11-02-2026 VSI Note:

Note:

Registry is directed to print the name of the learned counsel appearing for the respondents when the appeal is listed for admission.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

VSI in W.A.SR.No.17044 of 2026 11-02-2026 1.