Madras High CourtWP/7708/2018closed

S.Srividhya (Minor) v. Central Government Of India

2018-04-11Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.04.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.7708 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.9610 and 9611 of 2018 S.Srividhya (Minor), Rep. by her father and natural guardian H.Sekaran .. Petitioner Vs.

1. Central Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Lal Bahadur Sastri Smriti, Maulana Azad Road, Bal Bhawan, Man Singh Road Area, New Delhi-110001.

2. The Secretary, Government of India, School Education Department, C-Wing, Shastri Bhawan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, New Rajpath Area, Central Secretariat, New Delhi-110 001.

3. Central Board of Secondary Education, "Shiksha Kendra", 2, Community Centre, Vikas Mar, 'C' Block, Preet Vihar, New Delhi-110 092, Rep. by its Chairperson

4. The Controller of Examination, Central Board of Secondary Education, "Shiksha Kendra", 2, Community Centre, Vikas Mar, 'C' Block, Preet Vihar, New Delhi-110 092.

5. Central Board of Secondary Education, New No.3, Old No.1630A, J Block, 16th Main Road, Anna Nagar West, Chennai-600 040, Rep. by its Regional Officer.

.. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned Press Release in No.Nil, dated 30.03.2018 issued by the fourth respondent and to quash the same insofar as it directs to conduct Class XII Economic Paper (Code 030) Examination for the second time in respect of the petitioner is concerned and consequently declare the results for the petitioner based on Class XII Economic Paper Examination conducted on 26.03.2018.

For petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran For respondents: Mr.J.Madhana Goapl Rao, SCGSC for RR-1 & 2 Mr.G.Nagarajan for RR-3 to 5

ORDER

When the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that similar relief sought for before the Apex Court has been withdrawn by the petitioner therein in W.P.(Civil).No.268 of 2018 and by order dated 04.04.2018, it was dismissed as withdrawn by the Supreme Court, as, in view of the subsequent notification dated 03.04.2018, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner did not press the Writ Petition therein. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner in the present Writ Petition fairly submits that no further adjudication is required in this Writ petition, which is accordingly closed. No costs. Consequently, W.M.Ps. are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar cs To