Perumal, Aged 42 Years, v. State Rep. By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of May Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr. Justice S. VIMALA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.9759 of 2017 1 PERUMAL [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 KARTHIK Vs STATE REP. BY, [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SELAIYUR POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2017 For Petitioner : M/S.P.K.GANESH Advocate For Respondent : MR. M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 341, 384 and 506 (ii) IPC, in Crime No.not known of 2017, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that no case has been registered against the petitioners and no petition is pending enquiry against the petitioners with the respondent Police.

3. Recording the submission made, this petition is closed. -sd/- 24/05/2017 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SELAIYUR POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT.

+1CC to M/S.P.K.GANESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 9471 CRL OP.9759/2017 Date :24/05/2017 EGR 29/05/2017