Naresh Babu v. State Rep Inspector Of Police

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 506(ii) of IPC read with Section 25(1B)(a) of Arms Act in Crime No.216 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner along with other accused have trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, abused him and threatened with him deadly weapons. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner along with other accused have trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, abused him and threatened with him deadly weapons. He further submitted that sixteen previous cases are pending against this petitioner and if anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner, he will tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the bad antecedent of the petitioner and there is possibility of tampering the witnesses and hampering of investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

01.03.2023 jai

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

jai 01.03.2023