← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/3696/2026dismissed

Nelson Raj v. State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police

2026-02-16Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Nelson Raj ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Thiruttani All Women Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

Crime No. 03/2026 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 03/2026 on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent(s):

Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.01.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 137(2) of BNS and under Sections 3(d) r/w 4(2), 5(m) r/w 6(1), 9(m) r/w 10 of POCSO Act, in Crime No.03 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is ranked as A1. The victim is a girl child aged about 7 years. It is alleged that, taking

advantage of the minor girl, the petitioner committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault, which resulted in grievous injuries to the victim. Similarly, other accused also committed such offence and the same was reported to the family members and subsequently, a case has been registered.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person, he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the statement of the victim girl reveals that the petitioner has committed penetrative sexual assault and also caused injuries to the victim. Hence, he opposed for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

5.I have also gone through the statement of the victim girl, in which she narrates various disturbing facts including the manner in which she was subjected to sexual assault. Considering the fact that the investigation in this case is pending and the petitioner was arrested only very recently, this Court is

not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 16-02-2026 GBI To 1.State Rep. by The Inspector of Police Thiruttani All Women Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

Crime No. 03/2026 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J.

GBI 16-02-2026