Hinduja Foundries Ltd, v. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 20.04.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.29495 of 2012 and W.P.No.29496 of 2012 and M.P.No.1, 1 of 2012 Hinduja Foundaries Limited (formerly known as Ennore Foundaries Ltd.) having its registered office at Kathivakkam High Road, Ennore, Chennai 600 057 rep. by its company Secretary Goving M.Joshi ... Petitioner Vs.
1. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Ltd., NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
rep. by its Chairman.
2. Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
rep. by the Superintending Engineer, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle/North. ... Respondents PRAYER in W.P.No.29495 of 2012:
Writ petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order calling for the records relating to communication of the 2nd respondent, Lr.No.SE/CEDC/N/AEE/GL./F.Powercut/D.313/2012 dated 26.02.2012 relating to HT SC No.1347 and quash the same and direct the respondents to fix the ' Energy quota' and 'Demand quota' on the basis of Electricity supplied by the respondents, without reference to the electricity selfgenerated by the petitioner through wind mills. PRAYER in W.P.No.29496 of 2012:
Writ petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order calling for the records relating to communication of the 2nd respondent, Lr.No.SE/CEDC/N/AEE/GL./F.Powercut/D.313/2012 dated 26.02.2012 relating to HT SC No.1072 and quash the same and direct the respondents to fix the ' Energy quota' and 'Demand quota' on the basis of Electricity supplied by the respondents, without reference to the electricity selfgenerated by the petitioner through wind mills. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
In both the writ petitions For petitioner : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan in both WPs For respondents :Mr.P.R.Dhilipkumar (for R1,R2) standing counsel for TNEB in both WPs COMMON ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the writ petitions has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in the writ petitions.
2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, both the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mst To
1. The Chairman Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Ltd., NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
2. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., NPKRR Maaligai, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.
Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle/North. +2ccs to Mr.G.R.Associates, Advocate SR.No.24174 W.P.No.29495 of 2012 and W.P.No.29496 of 2012 and M.P.No.1, 1 of 2012 JP-II(CO) GMY(04/06/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/