Siva Vignesh v. State, Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 19.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Siva Vignesh

...Petitioner/Accused 2

Vs.

State through The Inspector of Police, Uthukuli Police Station, Tiruppur District.

(Crime No.575 of 2024) ...

Respondent PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.575 of 2024 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Vijayaraghavan For Respondent :

Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 16.12.2024, seeking bail Page No.1 of 6

in Crime No.575 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 308(4) of BNS.

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner along with the other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and robbed his mobile phone at knife point. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and A3 has been granted bail by the Trial Court and that the petitioner has been in custody from 16.12.2024 and hence, further custody of the petitioner is not required. Hence, he prays for the grant of bail. 4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there one previous case pending against the petitioner and the article has been seized. 5.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record.

Page No.2 of 6

6.Considering the period incarceration and the fact that the stolen article has been seized and the petitioner is on bail in other case and A3 has been granted bail and since further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of interrogation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli, Tiruppur District, and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; Page No.3 of 6

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

19.02.2025 ata Page No.4 of 6

Copy to:

1.The Inspector of Police, Uthukuli Police Station, Tiruppur District.

2.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli, Tiruppur District.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page No.5 of 6

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

ata 19.02.2025 Page No.6 of 6