Madras High CourtWP/11089/2017disposed of

M.Senthilkumar v. The District Civil Supply

2017-04-28Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.04.2017

CORAM

The Honourable MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.11089 of 2017 M.Senthilkumar [ Petitioner ] Vs 1 The District Civil Supply Officer Collector Office, Villupuram District.

2 The Special Tahsildar ( C.S) The Taluk Civil Supply Office Chinnasalem Post & Taluk Villupuram District.

[ Respondents] Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to issue new family card to the petitioner viz. M. Senthilkumar Son of Munusamy residing at Door No.6/18-A North Street Karadichithur village & Colony Chinnasalem Taluk villupuram District in pursuant to the application dated 08.01.2010 in Application No.3422 of 2010 and representation dated 29.11.2016 and pass order on the same within a reasonable time to be fixed For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajavel For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Government Advocate

ORDER

Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondents.

2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to issue new family card to him, pursuant to the application dated 08.01.2010 in Application No.408 of 2012 and representation dated 29.11.2016 within a time frame.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's application dated 08.01.2010 and representation dated 29.11.2016, the respondents have not issued the family card to him till date.

5. Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents submitted that the 2nd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's application and representation and pass orders in accordance with law, within a time frame.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner in the writ petition, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's application dated 08.01.2010 and representation dated 29.11.2016, and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of . No costs.

-s/dAssistant Registrar(CSV) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar rg To 1 The District Civil Supply Officer Collector Office , Villupuram District.

2 The Special Tahsildar (C.S) The Taluk Civil Supply Office Chinnasalem Post & Taluk Villupuram District.

+1 cc to M/s.P.Rajavel Advocate sr 26165 W.P.No.11089 of 2017 rk(co) aa11/05/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/