C.Rajendran v. The Agricultural Production

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 01.09.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 C.Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Agricultural Production Commissioner and the Secretary to Government of TamilNadu, Agriculture (A.A.1) Department, Fort St., George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

3. R.M.Subramanian, Deputy Director of Agriculture, (State Scheme), Karur, Karur District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to promote the petitioner herein to the post of Deputy Director of

Agriculture (Extension) for the year 2010-11 based on the inclusion of his name in the panel published by the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.123 Agri. (AA1) Department dated 12.08.2011, with effect from the date on which the third respondent herein came to be promoted with all consequential attendant service and monetary benefits and disburse all the arrears accrued thereon within a short date that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajkumar For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.L.S.M.Hason Fizal, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to promote the petitioner herein to the post of Deputy Director of Agriculture (Extension) for the year 2010-11 based on the inclusion of his name in the panel published by the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.123 Agri. (AA1) Department dated 12.08.2011, with effect from the date on which the third respondent herein came to be promoted with all consequential attendant service and monetary benefits and disburse all the arrears accrued thereon within a short date that may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 01.09.2023 mfa/gvn Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order

To

1. The Agricultural Production Commissioner and the Secretary to Government of TamilNadu, Agriculture (A.A.1) Department, Fort St., George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN ,J., mfa/gvn and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 01.09.2023