← Library
Madras High CourtWP/7149/2019disposed of

S.Rajendiran v. The Tahsildar

2019-04-26Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 26.04.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.7149 of 2019 S.Rajendiran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk, Kanchipuram District.

2.Sumathi 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram, Collector Office Campus, Kancheepuram.

(R3 impleaded as per order of this Court dated 26.04.2019 by KRCBJ in WMP No.10416/19) ... Respondents Prayer:writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider the representation dated 29.10.2018 for cancellation of patta in Kodapattinam village, Kanchipuram District in S.No.39/4, extent 17.50 Are (43 cents). For Petitioner : Mr.C.Samadharma Arasu For Respondents : Mr.R.Govindasamy for R1 and R3 Special Government Pleader Notice to R2-dispensed with.

O R D E R

Since this writ petition is being disposed of without affecting interest of the second respondent, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 and 3. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.The petitioner seeks for a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.10.2018 for cancellation of patta in respect of the subject matter property. Since such request has to be considered and decided only by the third respondent, who is now impleaded, it is for the third respondent to consider such request and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner, second respondent and other interested parties, if any.

3. As it is stated that the petitioner has given such representation to the third respondent on 29.10.2018, this Court, at this stage, without expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, directs the third respondent to consider such representation and pass orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, second respondent and other interested parties, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the third respondent within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vri To 1.The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk, Kanchipuram District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kancheepuram, Collector Office Campus, Kancheepuram.

+1cc to Mr.C.Samadharma Arasu, Advocate SR.No.40456 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.41210 W.P.No.7149 of 2019 RK(CO) GMY(19/06/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/