← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4887/2024granted

Kalaimani v. Inspector Of Police

2024-03-08Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan4 pages

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

The petitioner/A5 seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.7 of 2024 registered by the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Section 380 of IPC.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that the defacto complainant, Manager in Panley Milk had noticed 300 litres Stainless steel 304 Ice Cream Processing Plant were missing. They were worth about Rs.50,000/-. Thereafter, the respondent had implicated all the accused for the said theft.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that A1 to A4 had been granted bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Puducherry.

4. However, taking all the other factors into consideration this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from 1/4

the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Puducherry, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

2/4

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

08.03.2024 rjr 3/4

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

rjr 08.03.2024 4/4