Chandra v. Periyammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.01.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.R.P.(PD).No.3575 of 2013 and M.P.No. 1 of 2013 1.Chandra 2.Arivalagan .. Petitioners ..Vs..

1.Periyammal 2.Vasudevan 3.Narasimhan .. Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the rejection of their application to permit them to mark two additional documents for collateral purpose and to prove their possession in I.A.No.740 of 2013 in O.S.No.529 of 2005 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Harur dated 23.08.2013. For Petitioners :Mr.K.Thiruvengadam http://www.judis.nic.in

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

nl

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners represented that the Civil Revision Petition has now become infructuous, in view of the disposal of the suit. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

18.01.2019 kyl Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking orders To The learned District Munsif, Harur.

C.R.P.(PD).No.3575 of 2013 http://www.judis.nic.in