← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/4666/2025dismissed

Shanmugaraja .B v. Shyam

2025-10-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09.10.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO. 4666 of 2025 Shanmugaraja Petitioner

Versus

1.Shyan 2.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Bazaar Police Station Coimbatore Crime No. 269 of 2024.

Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to pass an order cancelling the anticipatory bail granted to the 1 st respondent in C.M.P.No. 6364 of 2024 in Crime No. 269 of 2024 on the file of 2 nd respondent by an order dated 14.11.2024 passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvasivakumar For R1 : Mr.W.Camles Gandhi For R2 : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ---- 1/5

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioner/de-facto complainant seeking to cancel the anticipatory bail already granted to the 1 st respondent herein in Crl.M.P.No. 6364 of 2024, dated 14.11.2024 in Crime No. 269 of 2024 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.

2.The learned Counsel for the petitioner/de-facto complainant submitted that after availing anticipatory bail, the first respondent had threatened the de-facto complainant once again and in this regard, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint before the 2 nd respondent police.

Therefore, the petitioner has come forward with the present petition seeking to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 1 st respondent herein.

3.According to the petitioner/de-facto complainant, he has lodged a 2/5

complaint before the 2 nd respondent police with regard to subsequent occurrence. However, no documents or any evidence produced before this Court except the copy of the complaint. Unless there is some material to substantiate the allegation, this Court has no valid reason to order cancellation. Merely based on uncorroborated allegations, cancelling bail is impermissible. Therefore, there is no grounds to cancel the anticipatory bail already granted to the 1 st respondent in Crl.M.P.No. 6364 of 2024, dated 14.11.2024 in Crime No. 269 of 2024 by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. Hence, this Court is not inclined to allow the above Criminal Original Petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09.10.2025 MSM To 3/5

1.The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore. 2.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Bazaar Police Station Coimbatore. Crime No. 269 of 2024.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

K. RAJASEKAR, J., MSM CRL OP NO. 4666 of 2025 4/5

09.10.2025 5/5