Karpagam v. The State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 10.03.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.4690 of 2021 Karpagam ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thirukoilur Police Station, Villupuram District.

(Crime No. 129 of 2021) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with the case in Crime No.129 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Lakshmipathy For Respondent : Mrs.M. Prabhavathi, APP

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) Petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.02.2021 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 323, 324, and 307 of IPC in Crime No.129 of 2021, seeks bail.

2. Totally there are 5 accused and the petitioner is arrayed as A3. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons and the injured person are neighbours. There was a long standing civil dispute beetween the parties. On the date of occurrence, A1 entered into the field of the defacto complainant with his cattle. when the defacto complainant questioned the same, A1 along with other accused said to have assaulted the defacto complainant and his mother with dangerous weapon and caused serious injuries to them. Hence, a case has been registered.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that due to civil dispute quarrel arose between the parties, in which, the defacto complainant and others attacked the petitioners and others and there was a case in counter. He would further submit that no overtact has been attributed as against this petitioner and he seeks bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that due to civil dispute, A1 along with other accused said to have attacked the defacto complainant and his mother with dangerous weapon and caused serious injuries to them. He would further submit that now injured persons were discharged from the hospital. Hence, she opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the said facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that injured has been discharged from the hospital and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

(a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirukovilur, and on further conditions that:

(b) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(c) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

(d) the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature;

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(g) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

(h) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 10/03/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUKOVILUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILLUPURAM [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, CUDDALORE.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUKOILUR POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.D.LAKSHMIPATHY Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.4690/2021 Date :10/03/2021 MK:11/03/2021