Madras High CourtCRP/3771/2013dismissed as infructuous

Kandasamy v. Kembulaskhmi

2019-10-04Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 04.10.2019 CORAM :

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.No.3771 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.Kandasamy 2.Krishnamoorthy 3.Ravi ... Petitioners Vs.

1.Kembulakshmi V.Subbulakshmi (Died) Veeraiyan (Died) 2.Latha 3.Geetha 4.Vimala 5.Jayalakshmi 6.Prema 7.Govindarajan 8.Anand 9.Manikandan 10.Ramalingam ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair order and decreetal order of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore dismissing I.A.No.39 of 2013 in O.S.No.259 of 2003 dated 18.06.2013.

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Baskar For Respondents : Mr.N.Suresh (R10) R1 to R5, R7 & R9 - no appearance R6 - not ready in notice R8 - No Appearance

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the relief sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous for the reason that the suit itself has been decreed and the learned counsel also made an endorsement to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar va To The I Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

C.R.P.No.3771 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 RGN(CO) CS/06/12/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/