← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6521/2021allowed

K.Revathi v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2021-03-12Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.03.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH WP No.6521 of 2021 and WMP Nos.7110 & 7111 of 2021 1.K.Revathi 2.R.S.Krishnasamy .. Petitioners Vs.

1.Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, District Police Office, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

3.M.Suresh .. Respondents Prayer: Writ petition filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned notice made in H2/74/SP/GDP/2021 dated 02.03.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent, quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents 1 and 2 from interfering with the interse matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent.

For Petitioner :

Mr.N.Manoharan For Respondents :

Mr.C.Raghavan Government Advocate respondents 1 and 2

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the summon issued by the respondent police under section 160 and 91 of Cr.PC.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Mohammed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. It is seen from records that in the present case even an FIR has not been registered under Section 154 of Cr.PC. It is now a settled law that even without the registration of a Crime, the police did not have the jurisdiction to issue summons under Section 160 of Cr.PC and compel the presence of the petitioner.

4. The summons under Section 160 of Cr.PC can be issued by any police officer for making an investigation and the sine quo non for issuing such summon is the crime registered in terms of Section 154 of Cr.PC.

5. In view of the above, the respondent police have issued a summon without jurisdiction and the same requires interference of this Court and accordingly, the impugned summon issued by the 2nd respondent is hereby quashed and accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rka To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, District Police Office, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate (SR No.16317) WP No.6521 of 2021 and WMP Nos.7110 & 7111 of 2021 GPL (CO) PR (09/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/