M.Rajendran v. The State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.02.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN Criminal Revision Case No.351 of 2020 M.Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Kuthalam Police Station, Nagapattinam District (Crime No.124 of 2019) ... Respondent Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. seeking to set aside the order dated 19.11.2019 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam in Crl.M.P.No.3349 of 2019 in crime no.124 of 2019 and to direct the respondent to return the Tata Ace Mini Lorry, bearing Registration No.TN51-M-6640 Chassis No. MAT445056BVC 25941 and Engine No.2751 D106CYYS54439 and to the custody of the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr. K.M.Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.K. Prabakar, Addl. Public Prosecutor.

O R D E R

This criminal revision has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 19.11.2019 passed by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, in Crl.M.P.No.3349 of 2019.

2. During regular rounds, the respondent / Police along with Revenue Officials intercepted the Tata Ace Mini Lorry, bearing Registration No.TN51-M-6640 (belonging to the petitioner) containing one unit of sand. A complaint was lodged, the respondent / Police seized the vehicle and registered a case against the petitioner under Sections 379, 430 IPC and 21 (1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation Act) 1957. Seeking return of the said vehicle, the petitioner, being the owner, filed Crl.M.P.No.3349 of 2019 under Section 451 Cr.P.C. before the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam and the said petition was dismissed by order dated 19.11.2019, challenging which, the present petition has been filed.

3.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent / State.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that there is no previous case against the petitioner nor this vehicle involved in any other case earlier.

5. Though the reasons given by the trial Court in dismissing the petition cannot be faulted, yet, this Court is of the view that if the vehicle remains in the custody of the police indefinitely, it will get deteriorated.

6. In view of the guidelines given by the Supreme Court in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat [(2002) 10 SCC 290], this Court is of the view that interests of justice will be served, if the vehicle is ordered to be released to the petitioner on certain stringent conditions. The respondent police is directed to grant interim custody of the said vehicle bearing Registration No.TN51-M-6640 to the petitioner within a period of seven (7) days from the date of compliance of the below mentioned conditions:

i. the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) before the jurisdictional Tahsildar as non-refundable deposit. After receipt of the above said amount,the same will have to be deposited by the Tahsildar, to the credit of the District Mines and Minerals Foundation trust as non-refundable deposit;

ii.the petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam. The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and give the copies of their Aadhaar Card;

iii.the petitioner shall give an undertaking before the respondent/ Police concerned stating that he will not use the vehicle in question for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondent and also the trial Court, failing which the respondent/trial Court is at liberty to confiscate the vehicle; iv.the petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned;

v. the petitioner shall take photographs of the vehicle and submit the same along with Compact Disc duly certified under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872;

vi.the petitioner shall surrender the original R.C. book before the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam; and vii.the petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondent. viii. It is also made clear that after release of the vehicle on complying with the conditions imposed by this court, if the said vehicle is found to be involved in any of the offence, it is always open to the respondent to proceed further for confiscation.

ix.Petition relating to return of R.C. Book for any purpose in the future, may be filed before the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, who may consider the same on merits.

6. This petition is allowed in the above terms. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar srk To

1. The District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam

2. The Inspector of Police, Kuthalam Police Station, Nagapattinam District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.K.M.SUBRAHANIAM, Advocate S.R.No. 17651 Crl.R.C.No.351 of 2020 PM(CO) KKV/23/03/2020