Radha v. Vimala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.02.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR CRP PD No.3856 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013

1. Radha

2. S.Nisha

3. S.Madhusudhanan ... Revision Petitioners Vs.

1. Vimala

2. K.Prem Kumar

3. Suriyanarayanan

4. Vaidegi alias Sasi ... Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 19.07.2013 passed in I.A.No.169 of 2012 in O.S.No.13 of 2012 by the Additional District Judge, Namakkal.

For Revision Petitioners : Mr.C.Jagadish For 2nd Respondent : Mr.T.Dhanyakumar For 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents : No appearance

O R D E R

It is the contention of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that though the application before the trial court had been filed to eschew the evidence of DW1, who deposed during chief examination, now, she is passed away and hence, nothing survives in this petition for further adjudication.

2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 13.02.2019 mst Index : yes/no Internet : yes/no Speaking order/non-speaking order To The Additional District Judge, Namakkal.

N.SATHISH KUMAR. J., mst CRP PDNo.3856 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 13.02.2019