L.David Praveenraj v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Fourteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.5881 of 2022 1 L.DAVID PRAVEENRAJ [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 A.MANIKANDAN 3 S.ARUL JOHN Vs STATE OF TAMILNADU REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAIYUR POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.58 OF 2022.

For Petitioner : M/S.B.BALAMURUGAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 427, 352 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.58 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. This petitioners along with A1 has gone to the defacto complainant's cake shop and after consuming cake, refused to pay money and when the defacto complainant demanded money, they have slapped him and broken the weighing machine and showcase causing loss of Rs.1,00,000/-. Hence, the complaint.

3. Heard both sides.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Considering the conduct of the petitioner as alleged in the FIR, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. -sd/- 14/03/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KEELAIYUR POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.B.BALAMURUGAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.5881/2022 Date :14/03/2022 RW 22/03/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/