Chellammal v. K. Chandrasekar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 19.09.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY Chellammal ... Petitioner in both C.R.Ps Vs.

1.K.Chandrasekar 2.Munusamy 3.Nagappan 4.Munusamy 5.Kanniammal 6.Natesa Reddiar 7.Munusamy 8.Govindammal 9.Megathal 10.Selvaraj 11.Perumal 12.Kothandan 13.Chinnakannu Pillai 14.Munusamy Reddiar 15.Ranganatha Pillai 16.Rani 17.Karpagam 18.Bokku 19.Anjali ... Respondents in both C.R.Ps (R2 to R19 are set exparte in suit proceedings. Hence, dispense with the notice to them) Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decreetal order dated 14.02.2013 made in I.A.No.461 of 2012 in O.S.No.622 of 1999 & I.A.No.1233 of 2012 in I.A.No.368 of 2004 in Page 1 / 3

O.S.No.622 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif, Ambattur. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramana Reddy (in both C.R.Ps) For Respondent : R1 - not ready in notice (in both C.R.Ps) R2 to R19 - given up (in both C.R.Ps) C O M M O N O R D E R When the Civil Revision Petitions were listed for hearing on 16.09.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was adjourned to 18.09.2019. On 18.09.2019 also, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 19.09.2019 (i.e.) today. Today also, though the matter has been listed under the caption "for dismissal", none appeared for the petitioner. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Civil Revision Petitions for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Index : No 19.09.2019 Internet : Yes va To 1.The District Munsif, Ambattur.

M.DURAISWAMY,J.

Page 2 / 3

va 19.09.2019 Page 3 / 3