Madras High CourtWP/3050/2012dismissed as infructuous

P. Selvam, S/O.Late.E.Palayam v. The Secretary To Government

2019-12-03Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.12.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P. No.3050 of 2012 and MP Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 P. Selvam ...

Petitioner Vs

1. The Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development Dept., Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, No.493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

3. The Revenue Officer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, No.493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

4. The Executive Engineer cum - Administrative Officer, TNHB Anna Nagar Division, Thirumangalam, Chennai - 600 101.

5. The Junior Engineer / Assistant Engineer (Maintenance) Shenoy Nagar, Government Servant Rental Quarters Scheme, Chennai - 600 030.

....

Respondents 1/3

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Board Cancellation Order No.GRS.2/58223/2011-1, dated 28.11.2011, passed by the 3rd respondent and the eviction Notice No.A.Na.Pani.2/4380/2010, dated 01.02.2012 passed by the 4th respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to occupy the House Flat in D-10, Tamil Nadu Housing Board Government Servants' Rental Quarters, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai - 600 030 with his family members. For petitioner : Mr.Mr.L.S.M. Hasan Fizal For respondents : Mr.R.S. Selvam, Government Advocate for R1 Mr.R.B.Bharath Kumar for TNHB

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has now become infructuous. It is also represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is no more. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for the Tamil Nadu Housing Board / respondents 2 to 5 submits that the petitioner has already been evicted from his premises.

3. Recording the endorsement as well as the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS III ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar vsi2 2/3