← Library
Madras High CourtWP/6736/2018disposed of

C.Dhasarathan, v. The District Collector,

2018-03-23Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.03.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition No.6736 of 2018 C.Dhasarathan S/o.Chakaravarthy Boopathy .. Petitioner Vs.

1.

The District Collector Villupuram District at Villupuram.

2.

The Sub-Collector 3.

The Tahsildar Gingee Taluk Villupuram District.

4.

The Revenue Divisional Officer .. Respondents PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 4 to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 11.09.2017 addressed to both the respondents respectively seeking rectification of error in the description of extent of property as mentioned in Patta No.145 (to be mentioned as 1.08.5 acres instead of 0.08.5 acres in S.No.91/3, Eachur Village, Gingee Taluk) and in Patta No.729 (to be mentioned as 0.13.0 Hectare instead of 0.26.5 Hectares in S.No.80/15 of Ponpathi Village, Gingee Taluk) on merits and as per law within a time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Mrs.N.R.Jasmine Padma For Respondents : Mr.R.Govindasamy Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

Mr.R.Govindasamy, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. The petitioner seeks for a mandamus directing the respondents 1 & 4 to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 11.09.2017, wherein and whereby, he sought for rectification of error in the description of extent of property in Patta No.145.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The grievance of the petitioner before this Court is that the said request has not been considered by the respondents so far. This Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, as it is for the third respondent to consider and decide the same. Thus, this writ petition is disposed of, only with a direction to the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 11.09.2017 and pass orders on the same, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner as well as the rival claimants and the other interested parties, if any. Such exercise shall be done by the third respondent within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mk To 1.

The District Collector Villupuram District at Villupuram.

2.

The Sub-Collector

3.

The Tahsildar Gingee Taluk Villupuram District.

4.

The Revenue Divisional Officer +1cc to Mr.L.CHANDRAKUMAR, Advocate, S.R.No. 22398 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 22826 W.P.No.6736 of 2018 SSV(CO) TR(10/04/2018)