← Library
Madras High CourtOP/794/2012dismissed for default

K.Punithavalli v. The Project Director

2019-07-05Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR O.P. Nos. 794 & 795 of 2012 K.Punithavalli ... Petitioner in O.P.No.794/2012 S.R.Kothandaraman ... Petitioner in O.P.No.795/2012 Vs.

1.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, 8th Floor, Annexed Building, SPIC House, No.88, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

2.The Competent Authority & Special District Officer (LA), National Highways, Kancheepuram & Tiruvallur District, Kancheepuram.

3.The District Collector, O/o.The District Collector, Tiruvallur District.

... Respondents in both Petitions Common Prayer:

Petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to set aside the award dated 19.05.2012 passed by the learned Arbitrator, bearing No. R.Dis 19996.2007/F3 and enhance the compensation payable to the petitioner.

For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : M/s.M.Sricharan Rangarajan Special Government Pleader ..in both petitions

Common Order The Original Petitions has been filed against the order of the learned Arbitrator dated 19.05.2012 bearing No. R.Dis 19996.2007/F3 and enhance the compensation payable to the petitioners.

2. When the matter was listed on 04.07.2019, the learned counsel for the petitioners made a submission that he has already handed over the case bundle and given change of Vakalat. Hence Registry was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and delete the name of learned counsel for petitioner and directed to be listed on 08.07.2019.

3. Today, the matters are taken up hearing. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioners either through counsel or in party in person. Since the matter pertains to the year 2012 and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, this Court is of the view that the parties are not interested in adjudicating this matter and there is no purpose in keeping the Original petitions

pending. Accordingly, these Original Petitions are dismissed as default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 05.07.2019 Pns Index : Yes/ No Internet : Yes/ No Speaking Order/ Non-speaking Order

N.SATHISH KUMAR.,J.

Pns O.P. Nos. 794 & 795 of 2012 05.07.2019