Muniyammal, Aged 50 Years, v. State Of Tamilnadu,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.07.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.KALAIYARASAN H.C.P.No.181 of 2017 Muniyammal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The Commissioner of Police, The Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-7.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, to call for the records relating to the detention order in Memo No.23/BCDFGISSSV/2017 dated 10.01.2017 passed by the 2nd respondent under the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 and set aside the same and direct the respondent to produce the petitioner's son Anandababu, S/o.Perumal [late], aged about 26 years the detenu, now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Hon'ble Court and set the petitioner's son Anandababu, S/o.Perumal [late] aged about 26 years the detenu herein at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.U.Yuvaraj For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the detention order passed in Memo No.23/BCDFGISSSV/2017 dated 10.01.2017 by the Detaining https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Authority against the detenue by name, Anandababu, aged 26, S/o.Perumal, residing at Mariamman Koil Street, Banavaram Village, Arakonam Division, Vellore District and quash the same.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has contended that the Detention Order in question has been already quashed by virtue of G.O.Rt.No.904 dated 23.02.2017 and to that effect, a copy of the same has been submitted and this Court has perused the same and found that the Detention Order in question has already been quashed.

3. Considering the above said factual circumstances, the relief sought for in the petition has become infructuous.

4. In fine, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gya To 1.The Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

2.The Commissioner of Police, The Commissioner Office, Vepery, Chennai-7.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai 600 066.

4.The Joint Secretary to Government, Public(Law & Order), Fort Saint George, Chennai - 9.

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

H.C.P.No.181 of 2017 SSI(CO) CA(19/07/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/