← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/406/2013dismissed as infructuous

Keerthivasan v. Princes

2019-11-27Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 27.11.2019 Coram:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 C.R.P.[PD]No.406 of 2013 Keerthivasan ..

Petitioner / 1st Defendant versus 1.Princes ..

1st Respondent / Plaintiff 2.Rajabai 3.Goldwin 4.Krisho Kirubha ..

Respondents 2 to 4 / Defendants 2 to 4 PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the plaint in O.S.No.168 of 2009 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Pollachi and to set aside the same. C.R.P.[PD]No.407 of 2013 Keerthivasan ..

Petitioner / 1st Defendant versus 1.Krisho Kirubha ..

1st Respondent / Plaintiff 2.Rajabai 3.Princes 4.Goldwin ..

Respondents 2 to 4 / Defendants 2 to 4 1/4

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the plaint in O.S.No.564 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Pollachi and to set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Gopalakrishnan [in both CRPs] for Mr.D.Muthuselvam For Respondent No.1 : No Appearance [in both CRPs] For Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : Not ready in notice [in both CRPs] C O M M O N O R D E R These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed against the plaint in O.S.No.168 of 2009 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Pollachi and against the plaint in O.S.No.564 of 2011 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Pollachi, respectively.

2. Today, when these Petitions are taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is present and made a submission that, the suits pertain to these Civil Revision Petitions had been dismissed by the trial Court in the month of January 2019 itself. In this regard, the learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect in these Petitions.

2/4

3. In view of the above said submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the revision petitioner, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. No costs. 27.11.2019 Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes sri To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Pollachi.

2.The District Munsif, Pollachi.

3/4

R.PONGIAPPAN, J., sri and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 27.11.2019 4/4