Madras High CourtWP/10641/2018disposed of

M/S Schedule Caste Community v. The Secretary To Revenue Dept.

2023-07-26Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice P.D.Audikesavalu5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 26.07.2023 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU M/s. Schedule Caste Community Progressive Sangam Rep. By its President Mr.M.Jaganathan No.19, Rangoon Street, Pathari Salai Thousand Lights, Chennai - 600 006.

.. Petitioner -vs1. The Secretary to Revenue Department Government of Tamilnadu, St. George Fort Chennai - 600009.

2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority "Thalamuthu Natarajan Building"

No.1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai - 600008.

3. The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation

4. The Zonal Executive Engineer Zone-IX, No.4, 4th Cross Street Lakeview Road, Chennai - 600 034.

5. The Commissioner of Police Greater Chennai, Vepery Chennai - 600007.

6. The Chairman Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board No.76, Anna Salai, Guindy

7. M/s. SPS Constructions Company Rep. By its Authorized Signatory No.8/31, V.P.Colony, Ayanavaram Chennai - 600023.

.. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 6 herein to see that 7th respondent takes and adheres to the following safety measures while proceeding with construction activities in their construction site at No.720, Pathari Salai, Thousand Lights, Chennai - 600006.

For the Petitioner : Mr. K.Lavan For the Respondents : Mrs. Shanmugavalli Sekar, SC (R6) Mr. K.M.D.Muhilan, AGP (RR1 & 5) Mrs. P.Veena Suresh, SC (R2) Mr. G.T.Subramanian, SC (RR3 & 4) R7 - Not ready in notice

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) We have heard Mr.K.Lavan, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Additional Government Pleader, for

respondents 1 and 5; Mrs.P.Veena Suresh, learned Standing Counsel, for respondent 2; Mr.G.T.Subramanian, learned Standing Counsel, for respondents 3 and 4; Mrs.Shanmugavalli Sekar, learned Standing Counsel, for respondent 6;

2. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the construction is already over.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner is also present.

4. As the construction work is over, the relief claimed now would not survive.

5. In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

(S.V.G., CJ.) (P.D.A., J.) 26.07.2023 Index : yes/no : Yes/No Maya

To:

1. The Secretary to Revenue Department Government of Tamilnadu, St. George Fort Chennai - 600009.