Kannayan, v. Sulochana,

S.A.No.688 of 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 19.06.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.N o.688 of 2011 1.Kannayan 2.Azhaganantham ... Appellants ..Vs..

1.Sulochana 2.Government of Tamil Nadu Represented by its District Collector, Cuddalore.

3.The Tahsildar, Panruti ... Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 31.01.2011 in A.S.No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti, upholding the decree and judgment dated 30.08.2008 in O.S.No.248 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Panruti.

For Appellants : No appearance For R1 : Ms.Jayanthi Venkatesh For R2 & R3 : Dr.S.Suriya, AGP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

S.A.No.688 of 2011 R. HEMALATHA, J.

mtl

JUDGMENT

When the second appeal came up for hearing on 15.06.2023, there was no representation for the appellants and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 19.06.2023. Even today, i.e., 19.06.2023 there is no representation for the appellants. Learned counsel for the first respondent and learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 2 & 3 are present.

2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

19.06.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No mtl To

1. The Sub Court, Panruti.

2. The District Munsif Court, Panruti.

3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras. S.A.N o.688 of 2011 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2