Parthiban v. The State Rep By Its, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.02.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Parthiban ... Petitioner Vs.
State Represented by The Inspector of Police R-7, KK Nagar Police Station, Chennai 600 083 ... Respondent (Crime No.19 of 2025) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest Crime No.19 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahendran For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 3(2)(a) & 4(1) of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 in Crime No.19 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that, the petitioner is running a Saloon & Spa under and name and style of Glow day Saloon and Spa, where it is alleged that prostitution is being conducted. 3.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case; 1/4
that and that the petitioner is ready to produce solvent sureties and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and also undertakes to appear and to co-operate for the investigation, and prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and on instruction submitted that there are no previous cases against the petitioner.
5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.
6.Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side, the fact that the petitioner has no bad antecedents and since, custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand 2/4
only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.
21.02.2025 sai 3/4
SUNDER MOHAN, J.
sai To 1.The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai 2.The Inspector of Police R-7, KK Nagar Police Station, Chennai 600 083 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
21.02.2025 4/4