S.Jeevana v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.06.2020 CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.A.P.SAHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Review Application No.46 of 2020 in W.A.No.51 of 2020 The Anna University, rep. by its Registrar, Anna University Campus, Guindy, Chennai - 600 025.
.. Petitioner vs.
1.Mahendra Institute of Technology, rep. by its Principal, Salem-Tiruchengode Highway, Mahendhirapuri, Mallasamudram, Namakkal - 637 503.
2.The University Grants Commission, rep. by the Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 001.
.. Respondents
Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w 114 of CPC seeking to review the order passed in W.A.No.51 of 2020, dated 14.02.2020 on the file of this Court.
For Petitioner : Ms.Narmada Sampath Addl. Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mr.G.Masilamani Senior Counsel for M/s.Muthumani Doraisami for respondent No.1 Mr.Rabu Manohar for respondent No.2
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) Having heard Ms.Narmada Sampath, learned Additional Advocate General along with Mr.M.Vijayakumar for the applicant and the grounds raised in the review application, we are satisfied that there is no error apparent on the face of the record in the conclusions drawn, particularly on the legal issues that were raised and which have
been categorically recorded from paragraph 14 onwards of the judgment dated 14.02.2020.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant vehemently urged that a certain fact relating to the action taken by the University could not be brought on record and, therefore, that error of fact impels the filing of the review application.
3. Learned counsel has invited the attention of the Court to the grounds raised in the review application, but we find that the contest that is sought to be raised before us through the review application is virtually questioning the action of the University Grants Commission on the ground that there was non-application of mind. This issue has already been dealt with by us and we find no challenge having been raised by the University to the action of the University Grants Commission independently of these proceedings. Consequently, we neither find any error of fact nor of law which may amount to an error apparent on the face of the record so as to warrant interference on the review application moved by the applicant University.
The review application, therefore, lacks merit and is accordingly rejected. No costs.
(A.P.S., CJ.) (S.K.R., J.) 17.06.2020 Index : Yes/No sasi/bbr To:
The Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi - 110 001.
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.
bbr Review Application No.46 of 2020 17.06.2020