Praveen Ragul v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of March Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr Justice G. JAYACHANDRAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.5980 of 2022 PRAVEEN RAGUL [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOZHATHARAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT (CRIME NO. 136/2022) For Petitioner : M/S.N.VIJAYARAJ Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 430 of IPC r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.136 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that on 04.03.2022, when the defacto complainant and their team were on regular patrol, they found that the petitioner illegally transported 1⁄4 unit of sand in a bullock cart without any valid license. Hence, the complaint was lodged before the respondent Police.
3.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent police.
4.
Considering the above fact, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kattumannar Koil, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which the anticipatory bail shall stand cancelled and on further condition that: (a) the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.
5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) before the concerned District Collector's Fund as non-refundable deposit, without prejudice to their defence before the trial court and submit proof of payment of the said amount before the aforesaid learned Judicial Magistrate, who after perusing the receipt/acknowledgment shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioners.
(c) the petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer as and when required.
(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(g) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 16/03/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KATTUMANNAR KOIL, CUDDALORE.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CUDDALORE [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOZHATHARAM POLICE STATION, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT MINES AND MINERALS FOUNDATION TRUST, CUDDALORE DISTRICT.
+1CC to M/S.N.VIJAYARAJ Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.4080 CRL OP.5980/2022 Date :16/03/2022 CSK 22/03/2022