← Library
Madras High CourtWP/9370/2011dismissed as infructuous

Mr.Kalaivanan, v. The Chairman / Secretary,

2019-01-08Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.01.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.9370 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Kalaivanan ... Petitioner Vs.

1 The Chairman/Secretary, Central Censor Board, Chennai.

2 The Secretary, Public Information and Broadcasting (Cinema), Fort St. George, Chennai.

3 S.A.Chandrasekar ... Respondents Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to ban the film "Sattapadi Kuttram" film directed by the third respondent.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent No.1 : Mr.M.Sundar Central Govt. Standing Counsel For Respondent No.2 : Mr.D.Raghu, G.A.

For Respondent No.3 : Mr.M.T.Arunan

O R D E R

The writ petition has been filed seeking mandamus, by directing the first respondent to ban the film "Sattapadi Kuttram" film directed by the third respondent.

2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the said movie had already been released seven years back and therefore the writ petition has become infructuous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.In view of the above, nothing survives for adjudication. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vaan To 1 The Chairman/Secretary, Central Censor Board, Chennai.

2 The Secretary, Public Information and Broadcasting (Cinema), Fort St. George, Chennai.

+1 cc to Mr.M.Sundar, CGSC, Advocate Sr.No.2368 +1 cc to Mr.M.T.Arunan, Advocate Sr.No.2030 W.P.No.9370 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 RSI(CO) CSL/12.02.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/