Madras High CourtREV.APPL/43/2012dismissed

Ekambara Reddiar v. Murugesan

2025-04-16Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16-04-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

1. Ekambara Reddiar S/o.Manicka Reddiar, Karamedu Village, Periyapalayam Post, Uthakottai Taluk, Thiruvallur Dist.

Appellant(s) Vs

1. MURUGESAN S/o.Etti, 12/13, Kavery Nagar, Kanthasamy Nagar Extension, Poonamallee, Chennai-56 2.KAMALAMMAL W/o.Murugesan, 12/13, Kavery Nagar, Kanthasamy Nagar Extension, Poonamallee, Chennai-56 PRAYER Review Applicatin filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Cr.P.C., to review the order of this Court passed in M.P.No.1 of 2011 in M.P.No.1 of 2009 in C.R.P.SR.No.39558 of 2009 dated 21.12.2011. For Appellant(s):

Mr. T.P. Sekar For Respondent(s):

M/s.G.Arulselvi, for Mr. T.Karunakaran, For R1 No Appearance For R2

ORDER

This Review Application is filed to review the order of this Court passed in M.P.No.1 of 2011 in M.P.No.1 of 2009 in C.R.P.SR.No.39558 of 2009 dated 21.12.2011.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and the material available on record was perused.

3. On earlier occasion, this Court directed the learned Additional Government Pleader on 09.04.2025 to take instructions regarding the persons in possession of the property comprised in S.No.134/1 at Rallapadi Village, Periyapalayam Firka, Uthukottai Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

4. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, it is reported by the learned Additional Government Pleader that the subject property had been sold to several persons, and they are in possession of the said property. He also submitted a copy of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.856/2025/Aa1, dated 14.04.2025 of the Thasildhar, Uthukottai, in this regard.

5. For better appreciation, the said letter dated 14.04.2025 is extracted hereunder:

6. In view of the above, this Court finds that there are no merits in the review application and also, no purpose would be served by restoring the Civil Revision Petition.

6. Accordingly, having found no grounds to interfere with in the review petition, the review petition stands dismissed. 16-04-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes klt To

1. The District Munsif Court, Thiruvallur.

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.

klt 16-04-2025