Senthil Kumar v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.07.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL.O.P.No. 4801 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No. 2752 of 2020 Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs.

1. The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Shoolagiri Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

2. Tahsildar, Shoolagiri Taluk Office, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

... Respondents/Complainant& Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records pending on the file of the respondent police namely Inspector of Police, Shoolagiri Police Station, Krishnagiri District in Crime No.642 of 2019 and to quash the Criminal Proceeding as against the petitioner concerned.

For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondents For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.642 of 2019 registered by the first respondent police for offence under Section 379 of IPC, as against the petitioner.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that after completing the investigation, there is referred as mistake of fact and also filed referred charge sheet and further the vehicle which was seized from the petitioner was also handed over to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Therefore, the prayer sought for in this petition has become infructuous. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(mdu) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar arb To

1. The Inspector of Police, Shoolagiri Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

2. Tahsildar, Shoolagiri Taluk Office, Shoolagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No. 4801 of 2020 A.SK(07/08/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/