← Library
Madras High CourtWP/1191/2015disposed of

S.M.Daniel v. The Chief Secretary

2015-03-17Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh3 pages

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 17.03.2015

CORAM:

The Honourable Mr. SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, Chief Justice and The Honourable Mr. Justice M.M. SUNDRESH Writ Petition No. 1191 of 2015 S.M. Daniel ... Petitioner vs.

1. The Chief Secretary Government of Tamilnadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai-600009

2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Egmore, Chennai-600008

3. The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram

4. The Branch Manager Axis Bank Limited Retail Assets Centre Pallavaram, Chennai.

5. M/s. Prime Sristi Housing Pvt. Ltd.

D5, Rajkamal Apartments Vinayaganagar, Madurai 625 020.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondents 1 and 3 to consider to pay the compensation for loss incurred by the petitioner as per the petitioner's petition dated 12.12.2014.

For Petitioner : Mr. S. Radhakrishnan For Respondents : Mr. S.T.S. Murthi Govt. Pleader for R1 & R3 Mr. A.L. Somayaji, Advocate General assisted by Mr. K. Raja Srinivas for R2 Mr.V.T.Gopalan, Sr. Counsel for Mr.S.Ashok Kumar for R5 No Appearance for R4

O R D E R

(Made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice) The petitioner claims that the land was purchased and building constructed and on 28.6.2014, the eleven storeyed building under construction by the fifth respondent collapsed and fell on his house and other two houses nearby, resulting in serious damage. The petitioner claims compensation from the Government on account of loss to his property. The petitioner has made a representation to the Government dated 12.12.2014.

2. We are, thus, of the view that the State Government may examine the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a maximum period of three months from today and pass its speaking order in respect thereof. We are sure that the Government would take a compassionate view of the matter to the extent possible. Needless to say that for any final relief, in case the petitioner is not satisfied with the decision of the Government, it can only be in civil proceedings, where by leading evidence, the exact compensation is quantified.

3. The petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, M.P. No.1 of 2015 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ATR

Copies to;

1. The Chief Secretary Government of Tamilnadu Secretariat, Fort St. George Chennai-600009

2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Egmore, Chennai-600008

3. The District Collector Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram +1cc to Mr.P.Ramaiah, Advocate, S.R.No.14746 W.P. No. 1191 of 2015 AK(CO) CA(24/03/2015)